An Employment Tribunal Award - huge compensation award
Law and Rights

An Employment Tribunal Award - huge compensation award


It is at Employment Tribunals where questions of unfair dismissal and unlawful discrimination at the workplace are heard.   The case of Dr. Eva Michalak v Mid Yorkshire NHS Trust and 14 other respondents  - (135 page judgment) - was decided at a tribunal in which sat in Leeds.  The case is a sorry tale and the final outcome is a large award of compensation.   The judgment on compensation is set out in a 44 page document - Dr E Michalak v Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust and others.  Dr Michalak was awarded £7180 for unfair dismissal and £4,452,206.60p for unlawful discrimination on grounds of sex and race.  See The Telegraph 16th December - "Woman doctor wins £4.5m for being fired after having a baby."

In relation to the sum of almost £4.5m, the NHS Trust and 3 respondents (Dr David Dawson, Dr Colin White and Mrs Diane Nicholls - Human Resources Director at the Trust) are jointly and severally liable.  Clearly, the trust will have the largest pot of money and this is money the NHS can ill afford at any time never mind in this abysmal economic climate.  The fact that
other employees such as the Resources Director can also be liable is salutary.

The £4,161,564.60 is actually the sum required to provide the claimant with £2,103,262.31.  The tribunal allows for the taxman's slice !

Employers have argued that high levels of compensation in discrimination cases can lead to weak, speculative or even vexatious cases.  Whether this is true is a moot point.  Naturally, higher levels of compensation will be awarded where the discrimination is extreme or where the claimant had a particularly high income from the employment.  In May, the government announced that compensation payments for discrimination would be added to their Employment Law Review..  However, EU Council Directive 2000/78/EC entitled ?Establishing a General Framework for Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation? Article 17 states:

?Member states shall lay down the rules on sanctions applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are applied. The sanctions, which may comprise the payment of compensation to the victim, must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.?  (Emphasis added).




- Rights, Remedies And State Immunity: The Court Of Appeal Judgment In Benkharbouche And Janah
Steve Peers Yesterday?s important judgmentin Benkharbouche v Sudan and Janah v Libya by the Court of Appeal raised important issues of public international law, the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, and demonstrated the relationship between...

- The Cjeu Rules On Obesity And Discrimination Law
  Katharina O Cathaoir In its judgment today in Kaltoft, the European Court of Justice has confirmed that obesity is neither a protected ground of discrimination under EU employment law nor a disability per se. However, in certain circumstances...

- ?i?ll Rest When I?m Dead?: The Cjeu Rules That Holiday Pay Can Be Inherited
 Steve Peers Unfortunately, all of us have to die someday. More unfortunately still, some people die during their working life, without having a chance to enjoy a well-earned retirement. This raises (among many other things) the question of whether...

- Surrogate Mothers' Day In The Court Of Justice: Reflections On Eu Sex Equality Law
Steve Peers Women who would love to give birth to children, but who are unable to do so for medical reasons, have always understandably attracted great public sympathy. Historically, the only option for them was adoption. But in the last few decades,...

- Sharon Shoesmith Wins Her Appeal
Sharon Shoesmith Basic facts: In April 2005, Sharon Shoesmith was appointed as Director of Children's Services at Haringey London Borough Council.  The appointment by a Council of such an officer is a statutory requirement - Children Act 2004...



Law and Rights








.