Inquest - London Bombs of 7th July 2005
Law and Rights

Inquest - London Bombs of 7th July 2005


With Addendum of 15th May

The Rt. Hon. Lady Justice Hallett DBE - Acting Deputy Coroner for Inner West London - has delivered a verdict of unlawful killing in relation to 52 deaths caused by the detonation of bombs in London on 7th July 2005 - often referred to now as 7/7.  The learned Coroner's closing remarks are available on the Inquest website.  Lady Hallett has also issued a report under Rule 43 of the Coroner's Rules 1984 - as amended by the Coroners (Amendment) Rules 2008.  The Rule 43 report contains 9 key recommendations - summarised here.   Such a report may be issued where a Coroner is satisfied that the evidence gives rise to a concern that circumstances creating a risk of other deaths will occur or continue to exist in the future, and is of opinion that action should be taken to prevent the occurrence or continuation of such circumstances, the Coroner may report the circumstances to a person who the Coroner believes has power to take action.

The Inquest explored in detail the circumstances of each of the 52 deaths and looked at the adequacy of the emergency response.  It was common ground that the evidence did not justify the conclusion that any failings on the part of any organisation or individual caused or contributed to any of the deaths.  The Coroner took considerable account of expert knowledge as to the effect of bomb blast on individuals in close proximity to the detonation.  Lady Hallett was satisfied, applying a balance of probability test, that each would have died whatever time the emergency services had reached and rescued them.

The inquests
were "Jamieson" type inquests - R v North Humberside Coroner ex parte Jamieson [1995] QB 1 as opposed to wider "Article 2 compliant" inquests- R (Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner [2004] 2 AC 182; [2004] UKHL 10.  

Lady Hallett also ruled that there was no cause to resume the inquests into the deaths of the four bombers.   Their families had not made any representations that the inquests should be resumed.  Under the Coroners Act 1988 s 16(3) an inquest may be resumed only if, in the opinion of the Coroner, there is sufficient cause to do so.  A campaign group referred to as "July 7th Truth Campaign" was ruled not to be an "interested person" - Coroners Rules 1984 - Rule 20(2).

Note for students:  The Middleton case - ( as well as the subsequent Sacker case) - is an excellent and beneficial example of the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on domestic law.   For inquests, in which State responsibility was implicated,  it was necessary to read the Coroners Act 1988 in a manner compliant with the requirements of Article 2 (Right to Life).  Thus, the Coroner had to consider not just how the deceased came by his death but also in what circumstances the death occurred.

Addendum - 15th May 2011:  A number of articles written by staff at the Royal United Services Institute will be of interest to readers.  Jennifer Cole (RUSI Head of Emergency Management) - "7/7 Inquest: Be careful of demanding the impossible."   Cole looks at improvements which have been made since 2005 - (e.g. introduction of Hazardous Area Response Teams etc) - and makes the point that many of these changes have not been drawn to public attention.  She also expresses concern at the possible impact of financial cuts in the present climate.  Margaret Gilmore looked at the separate question of whether 7/7 was actually preventable.

The blog of Michael Meacher MP looks at whether MI5 misled the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee.   Whether there should have been an inquiry into 7/7 is a serious question - see "7/7 and the public inquiry dilemma" - Channel 4 News 16th August 2007.

The government sought to have some of the inquest hearings heard privately.  This matter was addressed in the High Court - see "High Court upholds 7/7 secrecy ruling" - UK Human Rights blog 1st December 2010.  In November 2010, the Secretary of State for Justice informed Parliament that a Green Paper on the use of intelligence in judicial proceedings would be issued in the summer of 2011.




- Hillsborough Inquests Underway
Goldring LJThe April 1989 Hillsborough Disaster Inquests began today (31st March).  The initial inquests were never seen as satisfactory by the families of the deceased and fresh inquests were ordered by the High Court in December 2012. The new inquests...

- Coroners ~ Duggan Case ~ Reports
It is reported that the Coroner (His Honour Judge Keith Cutler) who presided over the Duggan Inquest is to invite the Duggan family to 'help shape police gun policy' - The Guardian 12th January 2014.  The judge, who is preparing recommendations...

- Inquest Or Inquiry? Litvinenko
Update 3rd October - Litvinenko's widow to seek judicial review of decision not to hold an inquiry - RTE Ireland  Update 12th July - an Inquiry has been ruled out even though the Coroner (Owen J) requested it - BBC News UK 12th July Update...

- Ian Tomlinson Inquest - Unlawful Killing Verdict
The jury at the Ian Tomlinson Inquest has delivered a verdict of unlawful killing - see the Inquest Website and The Guardian 3rd May. It now appears that the Director of Public Prosecutions (Mr Keir Starmer QC) is to review the earlier decision relating...

- Coroners: A Voice For Grieving Relatives
One of the oldest offices known to the law is that of Coroner.  Writing in The Times 1st May, Frances Gibb drew attention to how Coroners have become the voice of grieving relatives seeking to expose systemic failings which may have contributed to...



Law and Rights








.