Law and Rights
Today, the High Court rejected a challenge by the Press Standards Board of Finance (PressBof) which was aimed at preventing the Privy Council approving the Royal Charter of Self Regulation of the Press - The Independent 30th October.
Richard Gordon QC, representing PressBof, told the court that PressBof had not been given notice of a period of openness in which it could have made representation in support of its charter and that it was not provided with information on the process and the criteria on which its document would be judged. ?This process, we say, was conspicuously unfair,? he told the court. ?It?s almost Kafkaesque in terms of not knowing what the next step is intended to be.?
Nathalie Lieven QC, representing the Rt Hon Maria Miller MP, the Culture Secretary, said: ?There simply is no arguable case here that could possibly justify the granting of an injunction.?
The detailed Statement of Facts and Grounds for the challenge are available - HERE. (In itself, this is a useful document for those interested in the process of judicial review and the grounds on which a challenge can be based - e.g. duty to act fairly, right to be heard, duty of adequate consultation etc).
In essence, this challenge was based on the alleged unfairness of the process followed by politicians in rejecting the draft charter drawn up by the press itself.
Here is the petition for a charter issue by PressBof at the end of April and, for its rejection, see The Guardian 8th October.
The question of whether there is a royal prerogative power to regulate the press was not before the court and, for all I know, may never be. Possibly, PressBof could not sensibly raise such an argument having petitioned the Privy Council itself for a Charter. Nevertheless, it was interesting to speculate on the possibility that someone might put a challenge on that basis - 26th October - The Press ~ The Royal Charter ~ (again)!
Additional Reading:
Inforrm's Blog - Court rejects PressBoF's application for injunction
11 King's Bench Walk
Addendum 31st October:
The Independent - Queen sets seal on cross-party politicians' charter for press regulation
Addendum 7th November:
An appeal has been lodged - The Guardian 7th November
- Phone-hacking Trial - Charges, Verdicts, Links To Media Articles, Leveson And Beyond
Charges: What were the actual charges in the "Phone-Hacking" trial? Here they are as published by the Crown Prosecution Service. The charges arose from two Police investigations referred to as Operations Elveden and Weeting. CPS - Charging...
- The Press ~ The Royal Charter ~ (again)!
I make no apology for returning to the question of the Royal Charter on Self Regulation of the Press. This was discussed in my earlier post of 14th October - We by Our Prerogative Royal will, ordain and declare as follows That post concluded by...
- Press Regulation ~ View Of Journalists
London Evening Standard 23rd October Media heavyweights have branded the government?s proposed royal charter for press regulation a ?medieval piece of nonsense.? Speaking at a London Press Club debate last night Guardian editor-in-chief Alan Rusbridger,...
- The 'final' Draft Royal Charter On Self -regulation Of The Press
Here it is - the 'final' draft of the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press. The regulatory arrangements: 1. The Royal Charter - this creates a Recognition Body and sets out matters such as the membership of the body and its powers...
- Letters Patent ~ Royal Charters ~ Press Regulation
Two of the ways by which the Crown exercises its powers are the issue of Letters Patent and Royal Charters. Letters Patent: Letters Patent (Open Letters) are used in many areas. In May 2012 the Ministry of Justice referred to 92 types of...
Law and Rights
Press regulation ~ a legal challenge fails
Richard Gordon QC, representing PressBof, told the court that PressBof had not been given notice of a period of openness in which it could have made representation in support of its charter and that it was not provided with information on the process and the criteria on which its document would be judged. ?This process, we say, was conspicuously unfair,? he told the court. ?It?s almost Kafkaesque in terms of not knowing what the next step is intended to be.?
Nathalie Lieven QC, representing the Rt Hon Maria Miller MP, the Culture Secretary, said: ?There simply is no arguable case here that could possibly justify the granting of an injunction.?
The detailed Statement of Facts and Grounds for the challenge are available - HERE. (In itself, this is a useful document for those interested in the process of judicial review and the grounds on which a challenge can be based - e.g. duty to act fairly, right to be heard, duty of adequate consultation etc).
In essence, this challenge was based on the alleged unfairness of the process followed by politicians in rejecting the draft charter drawn up by the press itself.
Here is the petition for a charter issue by PressBof at the end of April and, for its rejection, see The Guardian 8th October.
The question of whether there is a royal prerogative power to regulate the press was not before the court and, for all I know, may never be. Possibly, PressBof could not sensibly raise such an argument having petitioned the Privy Council itself for a Charter. Nevertheless, it was interesting to speculate on the possibility that someone might put a challenge on that basis - 26th October - The Press ~ The Royal Charter ~ (again)!
Additional Reading:
Inforrm's Blog - Court rejects PressBoF's application for injunction
11 King's Bench Walk
Addendum 31st October:
The Independent - Queen sets seal on cross-party politicians' charter for press regulation
Addendum 7th November:
An appeal has been lodged - The Guardian 7th November
- Phone-hacking Trial - Charges, Verdicts, Links To Media Articles, Leveson And Beyond
Charges: What were the actual charges in the "Phone-Hacking" trial? Here they are as published by the Crown Prosecution Service. The charges arose from two Police investigations referred to as Operations Elveden and Weeting. CPS - Charging...
- The Press ~ The Royal Charter ~ (again)!
I make no apology for returning to the question of the Royal Charter on Self Regulation of the Press. This was discussed in my earlier post of 14th October - We by Our Prerogative Royal will, ordain and declare as follows That post concluded by...
- Press Regulation ~ View Of Journalists
London Evening Standard 23rd October Media heavyweights have branded the government?s proposed royal charter for press regulation a ?medieval piece of nonsense.? Speaking at a London Press Club debate last night Guardian editor-in-chief Alan Rusbridger,...
- The 'final' Draft Royal Charter On Self -regulation Of The Press
Here it is - the 'final' draft of the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press. The regulatory arrangements: 1. The Royal Charter - this creates a Recognition Body and sets out matters such as the membership of the body and its powers...
- Letters Patent ~ Royal Charters ~ Press Regulation
Two of the ways by which the Crown exercises its powers are the issue of Letters Patent and Royal Charters. Letters Patent: Letters Patent (Open Letters) are used in many areas. In May 2012 the Ministry of Justice referred to 92 types of...