Law and Rights
Sir Hugh Orde - President of the Association of Chief Police Officers - has set out a view that there is a "strong case" for looking at reconfiguring Police structures to match evolving threats and risk to the public in the 21st century - see ACPO website - " Opportunity to set a new direction." Sir Hugh clearly sees a future role for ACPO as a forum to enabling a corporate approach by which standards guiding Policing can be established or developed. He also sees it having a future as a coordinating body when an "effective, coordinating policing response" is required. He argues for a clear accountability structure and wishes to move ACPO away from limited company status. Finally, he defends undercover police work which
has given rise to some adverse media comment recently. The small community of officers tasked to carry out this exceptionally challenging job place themselves in real danger, day in, day out, dealing overwhelmingly with dangerous individuals in the higher echelons of criminality and such officers would not dream of working beyond their authorisations.
No sensible person seriously doubts the dangers of undercover Police work or that such work is necessary but it is clearly not confined to investigation of just the "higher echelons of criminality" and there are some serious questions about just what is "authorised." The recent protesters at Ratcliife-on-Soar cannot fairly be placed in the higher echelons of criminality. It is also difficult to see how ACPO is democratically accountable. To whom does it answer? This is not at all clear.
Sir Hugh has also been mentioned in the media for views about the Policing of protesters - see The Guardian 27th January 2011. According to the article, Sir Hugh argues that more extreme tactics may be needed to counter the threat posed by student protesters. He is concerned at how protests can be organised via media such as Facebook and says that some organisers do not engage with the Police. He defends tactics such as "kettling" and even the use of horses if proportionate. His further concern is that the standard of policing across the UK is being jeopardised by the government's refusal to modernise the way the police forces are split across 42 parts of the UK. The latter seems to be quite a shot across the bows of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill currently before Parliament which, if enacted, will lead to electorally accountable Police Commissioners.
Addendum 28th January 2011: It appears that the Egyptian government has ordered Egyptian internet serviecs providers (ISPs) to cease routeing all networks - The Guardian 28th January. Could it be that the Egyptian government fears that the internet is being used to organise protests? This seems likely. It is clear from Sir Hugh's comments (above) that there are similar fears in high places within the U.K.
- Worrying Trends - No. 3 ~ Upholding The Queen's Peace
The Police are the sharp end of law enforcement and it is fortunate that they continue to enjoy the general support of the public in their work as was recently demonstrated in Manchester - BBC 3rd October and BBC 4th October. Nevertheless, the Police...
- Climate Change Protesters - No.3 - I Was Just Wondering ...
The former Police Officer (Mark Kennedy) who infiltrated climate change activists has sold his story to the Mail on Sunday. Such stories are almost always self-serving but it is an interesting account - see Mail Sunday 16th January 2010. A...
- Why Should The Police Be Accountable --- Even To The Law?
Why should the Police be accountable, even to the law? Here is a suggestion from the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police that the rules should change so that is made much harder to take legal action against the Police. Given the...
- Police - Shake Up Planned
The Home Office has issued a consultation paper dealing with reform of the Police - "Policing in the 21st century: reconnecting Police and People". There will be Police and Crime Commissioners (to act as poweful representatives of the public) and...
- Acpo: Police Reform: Many Questions But Few Answers
The Association of Chief Police Officers (or ACPO) is, without any doubt, a body well-placed to exercise enormous influence on government policy relating to law and order. ACPO is a "Private Company Limited by Guarantee" but it receives funding from the...
Law and Rights
A new direction for the Police ? Sir Hugh Orde on the future of ACPO and comments about protests and undercover officers
has given rise to some adverse media comment recently. The small community of officers tasked to carry out this exceptionally challenging job place themselves in real danger, day in, day out, dealing overwhelmingly with dangerous individuals in the higher echelons of criminality and such officers would not dream of working beyond their authorisations.
No sensible person seriously doubts the dangers of undercover Police work or that such work is necessary but it is clearly not confined to investigation of just the "higher echelons of criminality" and there are some serious questions about just what is "authorised." The recent protesters at Ratcliife-on-Soar cannot fairly be placed in the higher echelons of criminality. It is also difficult to see how ACPO is democratically accountable. To whom does it answer? This is not at all clear.
Sir Hugh has also been mentioned in the media for views about the Policing of protesters - see The Guardian 27th January 2011. According to the article, Sir Hugh argues that more extreme tactics may be needed to counter the threat posed by student protesters. He is concerned at how protests can be organised via media such as Facebook and says that some organisers do not engage with the Police. He defends tactics such as "kettling" and even the use of horses if proportionate. His further concern is that the standard of policing across the UK is being jeopardised by the government's refusal to modernise the way the police forces are split across 42 parts of the UK. The latter seems to be quite a shot across the bows of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill currently before Parliament which, if enacted, will lead to electorally accountable Police Commissioners.
Addendum 28th January 2011: It appears that the Egyptian government has ordered Egyptian internet serviecs providers (ISPs) to cease routeing all networks - The Guardian 28th January. Could it be that the Egyptian government fears that the internet is being used to organise protests? This seems likely. It is clear from Sir Hugh's comments (above) that there are similar fears in high places within the U.K.
- Worrying Trends - No. 3 ~ Upholding The Queen's Peace
The Police are the sharp end of law enforcement and it is fortunate that they continue to enjoy the general support of the public in their work as was recently demonstrated in Manchester - BBC 3rd October and BBC 4th October. Nevertheless, the Police...
- Climate Change Protesters - No.3 - I Was Just Wondering ...
The former Police Officer (Mark Kennedy) who infiltrated climate change activists has sold his story to the Mail on Sunday. Such stories are almost always self-serving but it is an interesting account - see Mail Sunday 16th January 2010. A...
- Why Should The Police Be Accountable --- Even To The Law?
Why should the Police be accountable, even to the law? Here is a suggestion from the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police that the rules should change so that is made much harder to take legal action against the Police. Given the...
- Police - Shake Up Planned
The Home Office has issued a consultation paper dealing with reform of the Police - "Policing in the 21st century: reconnecting Police and People". There will be Police and Crime Commissioners (to act as poweful representatives of the public) and...
- Acpo: Police Reform: Many Questions But Few Answers
The Association of Chief Police Officers (or ACPO) is, without any doubt, a body well-placed to exercise enormous influence on government policy relating to law and order. ACPO is a "Private Company Limited by Guarantee" but it receives funding from the...