Law and Rights
The Guardian has recently published interesting items about delays in cases involving the care of children ("care proceedings"). Many of these cases are far from straightforward. Barnardos are suggesting a 30 week period in which care cases should be completed - see The Guardian 9th August - "Children left in danger by court delays". At the end of 2009, there were 12,994 open care cases in the courts. Cases are taking an average of 57 weeks to complete in the county courts or, in the magistrates' Family Proceedings Courts, an average of 45 weeks. A second article is by Mr Leslie Baker JP who is a member of the family proceedings panel in Wiltshire - The Guardian 20th August - "Decisions on care proceedings are too sensitive to be given a fixed deadline". He says that delays are due to the need to obtain the necessary information so that the court can make a proper decision. "Care orders, allowing children to be removed from their parents, are life-changing instruments and courts must be satisfied that a case merits such draconian action".
The essential fact is that both Barnardos and Mr Baker are basically right: delay is prejudicial to a child's welfare but always the full facts must be ascertained. An artificial 30 week "cut off" therefore seems impracticable. The real question then becomes - how can a better balance be achieved between delay and adequacy of information?
A further problem is that the Legal Services Commission (LSC) has succeeded (from October 2010) in taking away legal aid franchises from some 46% of the firms who practise in this vital area of law. Whilst there are some legal challenges afoot to the tender process used by the LSC, the outcome may still be a very big cut in legal aid and it would be almost impossible, in this complex area of the law, for an unrepresented parent to cope against the local authority and perhaps the Children's Guardian as well. Note: guardians are independent of the local authority and are usually assigned to particular cases by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS). The Guardian's role is to safeguard the interests of the child. The absence of legal representation is likely to make cases take even longer than at present.
The Lord Chief Justice has called for proceedings to be shorter - see Family Law 20th July. He also questioned whether the present ADVERSARIAL system is the right approach. Adversarial proceedings often polarise the parties who frequently adopt very entrenched positions and come to think of themselves as "winners" or "losers". See also Law and Lawyers 10th July.
- Child Care Cases - A Difficult Question Of Law Heading To The Supreme Court
In March 2004, a baby girl (T-L) was found dead in her parent's bed. Some weeks before her death she had suffered 17 fractures to her ribs. There was also other bruising. The official cause of death was asphyxia by obstruction...
- High Number Of Care Applications For Children // Government Responds To Norgrove
Updated The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has issued some interesting data which should give rise to considerable concern. Between April 2011 and January 2012, Cafcass received 8,403 new applications. This...
- Family Law And Legal Aid .... Do Families Not Bleed?
The High Court has quashed the tendering process used by the Legal Services Commission to award legal aid contracts to family law firms - see Law Society and Law Society Gazette. See also the earlier post on Law and Lawyers. Unfortunately,...
- Judicial Review: Family Legal Aid Tendering
Legal Aid in family cases - judicial review Given the complexity of family law and practice, the provision of legal representation is crucial. The Law Society has applied for a judicial review of the tender process used by the Legal Services Commission...
- Children And The Courts ....review By The Government
"The court therefore grants an interim care order to the local authority in respect of ...(child) ..." Those words are the nuclear option in child care cases. They often mean removal of the child from the family to foster carers of the local...
Law and Rights
Children and the courts .... concern over delays in care proceedings
The essential fact is that both Barnardos and Mr Baker are basically right: delay is prejudicial to a child's welfare but always the full facts must be ascertained. An artificial 30 week "cut off" therefore seems impracticable. The real question then becomes - how can a better balance be achieved between delay and adequacy of information?
A further problem is that the Legal Services Commission (LSC) has succeeded (from October 2010) in taking away legal aid franchises from some 46% of the firms who practise in this vital area of law. Whilst there are some legal challenges afoot to the tender process used by the LSC, the outcome may still be a very big cut in legal aid and it would be almost impossible, in this complex area of the law, for an unrepresented parent to cope against the local authority and perhaps the Children's Guardian as well. Note: guardians are independent of the local authority and are usually assigned to particular cases by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS). The Guardian's role is to safeguard the interests of the child. The absence of legal representation is likely to make cases take even longer than at present.
The Lord Chief Justice has called for proceedings to be shorter - see Family Law 20th July. He also questioned whether the present ADVERSARIAL system is the right approach. Adversarial proceedings often polarise the parties who frequently adopt very entrenched positions and come to think of themselves as "winners" or "losers". See also Law and Lawyers 10th July.
- Child Care Cases - A Difficult Question Of Law Heading To The Supreme Court
In March 2004, a baby girl (T-L) was found dead in her parent's bed. Some weeks before her death she had suffered 17 fractures to her ribs. There was also other bruising. The official cause of death was asphyxia by obstruction...
- High Number Of Care Applications For Children // Government Responds To Norgrove
Updated The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has issued some interesting data which should give rise to considerable concern. Between April 2011 and January 2012, Cafcass received 8,403 new applications. This...
- Family Law And Legal Aid .... Do Families Not Bleed?
The High Court has quashed the tendering process used by the Legal Services Commission to award legal aid contracts to family law firms - see Law Society and Law Society Gazette. See also the earlier post on Law and Lawyers. Unfortunately,...
- Judicial Review: Family Legal Aid Tendering
Legal Aid in family cases - judicial review Given the complexity of family law and practice, the provision of legal representation is crucial. The Law Society has applied for a judicial review of the tender process used by the Legal Services Commission...
- Children And The Courts ....review By The Government
"The court therefore grants an interim care order to the local authority in respect of ...(child) ..." Those words are the nuclear option in child care cases. They often mean removal of the child from the family to foster carers of the local...