Law and Rights
Photo credit: renewablenow.biz
- Denmark And Eu Justice And Home Affairs Law: Details Of The Planned Referendum
Steve Peers Danish participation in cross-border criminal law measures is symbolised by 'The Bridge', the 'Nordic Noir' series about cross-border cooperation in criminal matters between Denmark and Sweden. But due to the...
- Childhood?s End: Eu Criminal Law In 2014
Steve Peers With the elections to the European Parliament, the installation of a new European Commission, and a number of important legislative and case-law developments, 2014 was an important year for the European Union. This is the first in...
- What Just Happened? The House Of Commons ?vote? On The European Arrest Warrant
Steve Peers Last night, the UK House of Commons voted in favour of the UK opting back in to 35 EU policing and criminal law measures, including the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). Or rather, it didn?t: it voted in favour of the UK opting back to 11...
- Metamorphosis Of The Third Pillar: The End Of The Transition Period For Eu Criminal And Policing Law
by Emilio De Capitani On 1st December 2014, after five years of ?legal gestation?, the previous ?third pillar? of EU law will finally transform itself from an intergovernmental larva into a supranational butterfly. But will this really ensure a coherent...
- Opt Outs And The Eu ~ Is The Uk Heading For The Exit
There is little doubt that membership of the European Union (EU) is thoroughly disliked by some members of the present British government and public dislike of membership seems to have increased as a result of all the financial problems in the "Eurozone"...
Law and Rights
EU Zombie Law: the CJEU re-animates the old 'third pillar'
Steve Peers
Back in 1993, when the Maastricht Treaty entered into force, the EU began adopting measures on criminal law and policing under a peculiar institutional system, known in practice as the ?third pillar? of EU law. This system was amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1999, and then survived several attempts to kill it over the next decade; indeed I once compared it to Rasputin. The Treaty of Lisbon nominally finished it off it as from that Treaty?s entry into force (1 December 2009); but this was subject to a five-year transitional period.
That makes it sound as though the third pillar finally came to an end on 1 December 2014 ? but it did not. Indeed two judgments of the CJEU yesterday (here and here) not only maintain old third pillar measures in force, but allow new measures based on them to be adopted. Third pillar measures aren?t exactly dead yet ? rather they are undead. Let?s take a look at these zombies of EU law.
Background
The Treaty of Lisbon has a transitional Protocol, which contains two rules relating to the third pillar. First of all, Article 10 sets out the five-year transitional period, after which the normal jurisdiction of the CJEU would apply to the measures concerned. At the same time, the UK could choose to opt out of all of these measures, and then opt back in to some of them, as it indeed did last year (see discussion here).
Secondly, Article 9 of that Protocol, which is not subject to a time limit, states that third pillar measures adopted before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon stay in force until they are amended or repealed. Some of them have been amended or repealed, or will be soon (the law establishing Europol, for instance). But the majority remain in force, including the controversial law establishing the European Arrest Warrant (EAW).
Why does this still matter? First of all, the pre-Lisbon measures don?t confer direct effect on individuals, so can?t be invoked to create rights in national courts. Secondly, this means that the European Parliament (EP) has not had any real say in the adoption of these measures. In particular, the EP has a lot of excellent suggestions for the reform of the EAW. Thirdly, a legal question arises as to whether the pre-Lisbon measures can serve as a legal basis for the adoption of new measures even after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. This question was answered by yesterday?s judgments.
Judgments
The EP challenged the validity of post-Lisbon Council measures which had implemented pre-Lisbon EU criminal law acts, in particular giving police forces access to the EU?s Visa Information System and prohibiting some new designer drugs. There are parallel actions still pending, against measures implementing pre-Lisbon laws establishing Europol and the ?Prum? system of exchanging data between national police forces.
The reason for the EP?s objection to these measures was that the Council exercises these powers by means of a qualified majority vote, and argues that it does not have to consult the EP at all, since the legal requirement to consult the EP was set out in the old third pillar rules in the Treaty, which were repealed by the Treaty of Lisbon. In the EP?s view, the Council should use the post-Lisbon rules for the adoption of implementing measures, ie giving the Commission the power to adopt delegated acts over which the EP has control. Alternatively, fresh EU legislative acts have to be adopted; these would be subject to the ordinary legislative procedure.
The CJEU ruled that, in accordance with Article 9 of the transitional protocol, the pre-Lisbon measures remain in force. In the Court?s view, that also means that the Council is entitled to adopt implementing measures following the pre-Lisbon process. However, the Court, unlike the Advocate-General, said that the Council at least has to consult the European Parliament on these measures. It reasoned in effect that the cross-reference to the repealed Treaty rules in the pre-Lisbon legislation retained those rules in force.
Comments
The Court?s ruling in effect allows the Council to create new third pillar acts long after the third pillar has nominally died. It?s as if zombies could procreate, and give birth to baby zombies (I?m going for a ?grossest legal analogy? award here). Furthermore, the Court?s reasoning as regards the EP?s partial victory means that to some extent, even aspects of the long-dead Treaty rules on the third pillar have now been zombified by the Court.
How much damage could these zombies do? There?s no risk of the famous ?zombie apocalypse? affecting EU law. Apart from these implementing measures, all other EU criminal law acts adopted since the Treaty of Lisbon have taken the normal EU form of Directives and Regulations, and have been subject to the post-Lisbon procedures (usually the ordinary legislative procedure). Many pre-Lisbon EU measures (such as the EAW law) don?t provide for implementing measures, and some of those which do (such as the Europol law, as mentioned already) will be replaced soon.
The Court?s rulings are a reasonable legal interpretation of the transitional rules. But the broader political problem remains: many controversial measures affecting civil liberties have had no real input from the EP. Since its resort to the courts has had only limited success, the EP should now consider alternative means (blocking legislation or budget disbursements) to achieve the goals of reviewing pre-Lisbon EU criminal laws ? and in particular securing much-needed reforms to the EAW.
Barnard & Peers: chapter 25
- Denmark And Eu Justice And Home Affairs Law: Details Of The Planned Referendum
Steve Peers Danish participation in cross-border criminal law measures is symbolised by 'The Bridge', the 'Nordic Noir' series about cross-border cooperation in criminal matters between Denmark and Sweden. But due to the...
- Childhood?s End: Eu Criminal Law In 2014
Steve Peers With the elections to the European Parliament, the installation of a new European Commission, and a number of important legislative and case-law developments, 2014 was an important year for the European Union. This is the first in...
- What Just Happened? The House Of Commons ?vote? On The European Arrest Warrant
Steve Peers Last night, the UK House of Commons voted in favour of the UK opting back in to 35 EU policing and criminal law measures, including the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). Or rather, it didn?t: it voted in favour of the UK opting back to 11...
- Metamorphosis Of The Third Pillar: The End Of The Transition Period For Eu Criminal And Policing Law
by Emilio De Capitani On 1st December 2014, after five years of ?legal gestation?, the previous ?third pillar? of EU law will finally transform itself from an intergovernmental larva into a supranational butterfly. But will this really ensure a coherent...
- Opt Outs And The Eu ~ Is The Uk Heading For The Exit
There is little doubt that membership of the European Union (EU) is thoroughly disliked by some members of the present British government and public dislike of membership seems to have increased as a result of all the financial problems in the "Eurozone"...