Fighting abroad ~ is it against the law?
Law and Rights

Fighting abroad ~ is it against the law?


Imagine that in some foreign land there is a political power struggle.  Those opposing the de facto (or de jure) government seek help by violent means and individuals decide to provide such help.  Could this be an act of terrorism in our law?  For an historical example, see the International Brigades.   In modern times, some British citizens have been fighting alongside those in opposition to President Assad in Syria.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has chosen to warn of the possible consequences for those who decide to go to Syria to oppose the Assad government - see The Muslim Issue  and also BBC - Britons returning from Syria face arrest, says Police Chief 25th January 2014.  The concern is that young people who do this may have become "radicalised" and thus become a threat within the UK.

In the UK,
terrorism is defined on the Terrorism Act 2000 section 1.

In this Act ?terrorism? means the use or threat of action where -  
(a) the action falls within subsection (2),
(b) the use or threat is designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and
(c) the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.

Action involving serious violence against a person or serious damage to property are examples of matters within subsection 2.   Subsection 4 extends the word "action" to actions outside the UK.  Any reference to "property" includes property outside the UK.  Also, the word "government" includes the government of a country other than the UK.

Thus, the reach of UK terrorism law is very wide.  No matter how evil or detestable the regime being opposed, those opposing it may find that they have committed a terrorist offence.

The reason(s) for the CPS announcement are not entirely clear but it is interesting that the announcement came just before the publication of the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill which will increase the penalties for certain terrorist offences to life imprisonment.  For example, the Bill contains this clause:

In section 54(6)(a) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (penalty on conviction on indictment of offence involving weapons training for terrorism), for ?imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years? substitute ?imprisonment for life?.

The Terrorism Act contains provisions for extra-territorial jurisdiction

There is an Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Laws - Mr David Anderson QC

Additional links:

7th February - Both sides in Syrian conflict might be guilty of war crimes according to the United Nations

Last moments of the British jihadist - Daily Mail 7th February

11th February - George Monbiot - The Guardian - Orwell was hailed a hero for fighting in Spain. Today, he'd be guilty of terrorism  

17th February - Independent - Growing fears over Britions radicalised in Syrian conflict




- Counter-terrorism Law
Just a reminder that the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill is racing along its fast-track through Parliament.  The Bill (as introduced) is considered in this earlier post.  Please also see this post by Angela Patrick on the UK Human Rights...

- The Counter-terrorism And Security Bill ~ Overview
Once enacted, the latest Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill will be the 6th terrorism-related Act since year 2000.  The announcement of the need for additional legislation was covered in my blogpost of 15th November.   Earlier this week the...

- Terrorism ~ Report On The Murder Of Fusilier Lee Rigby
The need for legislation to give Ministers more anti-terrorism powers was announced earlier this month - Further anti-terrorism powers (15th November).  The new Anti-terrorism and Security Bill is to be presented to Parliament on Wednesday 26th November. ...

- Further Anti-terrorism Powers
The Government is particularly concerned about UK citizens who travel to conflict zones and perhaps return to the UK with skills and intentions acquired from fighting or training with terrorist groups.  In a speech to the Australian Parliament, the...

- R V Gul - Uk Supreme Court - Observations
'Terrorism' has proved very difficult to define and there is no internationally agreed definition.  For the purposes of law in the United Kingdom, the Terrorism Act 2000 section 1 gives the following definition: (1) In this Act ?terrorism?...



Law and Rights








.