Law and Rights
There are a number of ways by which a case gets into the Crown Court for trial. Where the offence is "either-way" (i.e. triable by either Magistrates or Crown Court) there will be "committal proceedings" if either the Magistrates' Court has rejected jurisdiction or the defendant has elected for trial in the Crown Court. Where the offence is triable only in the Crown Court (e.g. Murder, Manslaughter etc) the case will be "sent" under the procedure in the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 s.51. (Prior to the 1998 Act, even indictable only cases were subject to committal proceedings).
Another, rarely used, method is known as the Voluntary Bill of Indictment. Such a Bill has been used in the case of "Venables" who will stand trial in the Crown Court on charges relating to child pornography - see The Guardian 21st June. The charges are under the Protection of Children Act 1978 s.1 and, when tried in the Crown Court, the maximum sentence is 10 years imprisonment. In 1993, Venables, along with Thompson, was convicted of the murder of James Bulger. Following his conviction, Venables was provided with a new identity and this may not be revealed.
Grand Juries existed in England until the Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1933. [Some of the history of grand juries may be read at R v Clarke, McDaid [2008] UKHL 8]. Historically, Grand Juries came into being after the Assize of Clarendon 1166 provided for "Justices" to travel from town to town and to call upon freemen to report accusations of crime. This was one way in which Henry II wrested control from local barons to the Royal Judges. Over time, "Grand Juries" came to consider charges and to decide whether they should be tried. However, their use became superseded by committal proceedings before magistrates. The 1933 Act abolished Grand Juries which had, in practice, become something of an excuse for a "social junket" and were considered to be no longer serving a useful purpose. The Act permits a Voluntary Bill of Indictment to be issued with the consent of a Judge of the High Court. The use of this procedure is governed by strict rules and there is no hearing in the Magistrates' Court if this procedure is used. The usual occasions when this procedure is invoked are set out at CPS Legal Guidance.
Addendum 24th July: Venables received a 2 year sentence of imprisonment - see The Guardian 23rd July and also discussion of the legal issues raised by the case.
- The Question Of Bail ~ Oscar Pistorius ~ Operation Weeting
Given the Oscar Pistorius case in South Africa and, in England, the on-going Operation Weeting, bail is well and truly in the news. Oscar Pistorius: The world famous paralympian Oscar Pistorius stands charged in South Africa with the murder (on 14th...
- Mob Rule - Is It All That Far Away?
One of the fundamental principles of English Law is the presumption of innocence. We do not declare a person guilty of any crime - however heinous the crime - until guilt is proved by admissible evidence adduced before a properly constituted court...
- Criminal Liability Of Children And Their Trials
Two boys (now aged 10 and 11) have been convicted of attempted rape - see The Independent 24th May 2010. The trial was held at the Old Bailey and has sparked outrage in some quarters (especially children's charities) - see the BBC report. The...
- Youth Court Trial
Persons under age 18 are normally tried in the Youth Courts which are based in Magistrates' Courts throughout England and Wales. Magistrates have to be specifically authorised to sit in the youth court and the authorisation is achieved by undertaking...
- The Right To Bail: Is It Disappearing Or Being Whittled Down?
A fundamental element of English criminal law and practice is that the accused is to be considered ?innocent until proven guilty? before a court of law. The ?presumption of innocence? is the foundation of the now very heavily amended Bail Act 1976. The...
Law and Rights
Getting cases to the Crown Court for trial and the Venables case
Another, rarely used, method is known as the Voluntary Bill of Indictment. Such a Bill has been used in the case of "Venables" who will stand trial in the Crown Court on charges relating to child pornography - see The Guardian 21st June. The charges are under the Protection of Children Act 1978 s.1 and, when tried in the Crown Court, the maximum sentence is 10 years imprisonment. In 1993, Venables, along with Thompson, was convicted of the murder of James Bulger. Following his conviction, Venables was provided with a new identity and this may not be revealed.
Grand Juries existed in England until the Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1933. [Some of the history of grand juries may be read at R v Clarke, McDaid [2008] UKHL 8]. Historically, Grand Juries came into being after the Assize of Clarendon 1166 provided for "Justices" to travel from town to town and to call upon freemen to report accusations of crime. This was one way in which Henry II wrested control from local barons to the Royal Judges. Over time, "Grand Juries" came to consider charges and to decide whether they should be tried. However, their use became superseded by committal proceedings before magistrates. The 1933 Act abolished Grand Juries which had, in practice, become something of an excuse for a "social junket" and were considered to be no longer serving a useful purpose. The Act permits a Voluntary Bill of Indictment to be issued with the consent of a Judge of the High Court. The use of this procedure is governed by strict rules and there is no hearing in the Magistrates' Court if this procedure is used. The usual occasions when this procedure is invoked are set out at CPS Legal Guidance.
Addendum 24th July: Venables received a 2 year sentence of imprisonment - see The Guardian 23rd July and also discussion of the legal issues raised by the case.
- The Question Of Bail ~ Oscar Pistorius ~ Operation Weeting
Given the Oscar Pistorius case in South Africa and, in England, the on-going Operation Weeting, bail is well and truly in the news. Oscar Pistorius: The world famous paralympian Oscar Pistorius stands charged in South Africa with the murder (on 14th...
- Mob Rule - Is It All That Far Away?
One of the fundamental principles of English Law is the presumption of innocence. We do not declare a person guilty of any crime - however heinous the crime - until guilt is proved by admissible evidence adduced before a properly constituted court...
- Criminal Liability Of Children And Their Trials
Two boys (now aged 10 and 11) have been convicted of attempted rape - see The Independent 24th May 2010. The trial was held at the Old Bailey and has sparked outrage in some quarters (especially children's charities) - see the BBC report. The...
- Youth Court Trial
Persons under age 18 are normally tried in the Youth Courts which are based in Magistrates' Courts throughout England and Wales. Magistrates have to be specifically authorised to sit in the youth court and the authorisation is achieved by undertaking...
- The Right To Bail: Is It Disappearing Or Being Whittled Down?
A fundamental element of English criminal law and practice is that the accused is to be considered ?innocent until proven guilty? before a court of law. The ?presumption of innocence? is the foundation of the now very heavily amended Bail Act 1976. The...