Law and Rights
The CJEU rules on obesity and discrimination law
Katharina O Cathaoir
In its judgment today in Kaltoft, the European Court of Justice has confirmed that obesity is neither a protected ground of discrimination under EU employment law nor a disability per se. However, in certain circumstances the EU?s Directive banning discrimination in employment on grounds of disability could apply. (Note that EU law does not ban disability discrimination outside the workplace, so today?s judgment will only be relevant to employment disputes.)
Obesity as a protected ground
The case concerned a man who alleged that he lost his job due to his obesity (for more details of the facts, and a discussion of the opinion of the Advocate General, see here). The Court agreed with the Advocate-General that obesity is not a protected ground under EU employment law. There is no mention of obesity in the TFEU or TEU. Neither is there a general prohibition of discrimination. The protected grounds of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation are exhaustive and it is not for the Court to extend these by analogy (there are also EU rules on sex, race and nationality discrimination). However, Member States may provide for increased protection under national law.
Obesity as a disability
The Court adopted a functionality test whereby obesity can only amount to a disability when accompanied by an impairment of the individual?s ability to work on an equal basis to others. Individuals do not have to be incapable of fulfilling their employment tasks, but their ability to do so on the same basis as others must be impaired. The Court suggested that individuals with obesity and decreased mobility or resulting diseases that hinder work ability or cause discomfort that does so, may have a disability under EU employment law. Thus, it is the effect of obesity, not obesity in itself, which is of importance in deciding whether an individual has a disability.
The Court avoided the AG?s suggestion that individuals at the upper most level of obesity (BMI 40+) could be assumed to have functionality issues and thereby, a disability. The Court instead made no mention of BMI as a measure of disability and concentrated on the effect of obesity, not the degree to which an individual is obese.
It will be for the Danish court, which referred these questions to the CJEU, to decide whether Mr. Kaltoft?s obesity entailed a limitation that affected his ability to do his work on an equal basis to others.
Implications
Although we are may be flooded with inaccurate headlines, the position of individuals with obesity under EU law seems to remain unchanged. Employers are likely to breathe a sigh of relief that a BMI test has been avoided. Indeed, this could have led to an appearance based test whereby employers felt pushed to keep an eye on their employees? size. How and should an employer have access to this kind of personal information?
The case has brought obesity to the fore. Given the level of obesity in Europe, employers may begin to rethink their work practices. The employer has a role to play in his or her employee?s health. For example, employers may reconsider the food they serve in their canteens or the extent to which they make physical exercise accessible to their employees, if it will have ramifications for their legal obligations under discrimination law.
Barnard & Peers: chapter 20
-
Minimum Physical Education Requirements In California Schools
By Michelle Ball, California Education Attorney for Students since 1995 Did you dread exercise as a child or did you long to run and play kickball during math or English instruction? It seems that the time allotted for Physical Education (PE) has dwindled...
-
More Back-slapping Than Soul-searching: The European Commission?s Reflections On The Un Convention On The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities
Dr. Charlotte O?Brien, Lecturer in Law, York Law School, University of York More than seven years on from signing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), and three and a half years on from conclusion of the Convention,...
-
Surrogate Mothers' Day In The Court Of Justice: Reflections On Eu Sex Equality Law
Steve Peers Women who would love to give birth to children, but who are unable to do so for medical reasons, have always understandably attracted great public sympathy. Historically, the only option for them was adoption. But in the last few decades,...
-
When Does The Eu Charter Of Rights Apply To Private Parties?
Steve Peers The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has today further clarified the circumstances in which the EU's Charter of Rights can be invoked against private parties. In Association de Mediation Sociale (AMS), trade unions challenged...
-
An Employment Tribunal Award - Huge Compensation Award
It is at Employment Tribunals where questions of unfair dismissal and unlawful discrimination at the workplace are heard. The case of Dr. Eva Michalak v Mid Yorkshire NHS Trust and 14 other respondents - (135 page judgment) - was decided...
Law and Rights