Law and Rights
Art. 267 states:-
?The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning:
a) the interpretation of the Treaties;
b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union.
Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give a ruling thereon.
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court.
If such a question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State with regard to a person in custody, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall act with the minimum of delay."
The Publican - 6th October 2010 - "EU governments give evidence in Murphy satellite case"
- Building The Eu Judicial System: Politicians 1, (judicial) Architects 0
Steve Peers The Court of Justice has recently proposed that the EU should double the number of judges on the General Court, and abolish the EU?s Civil Service Tribunal. Why did the Court propose such a dramatic change to the EU judicial system?...
- Enforcing Previous Judgments Of The Court Of Justice
By Steve Peers The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has recently delivered an interesting judgment concerning the so-called 'infringement procedure', which is the system for enforcing EU law directly in the EU courts. This system runs in parallel...
- New Uk Judge Appointed To The Court Of Justice Of The Eu
Christopher Vajda QC (currently of Monckton Chambers) has been appointed as the UK Judge to the Court of Justice of the European Union. He will succeed Sir Konrad Schiemann who has been the UK's judge there since 2004. Read the announcement...
- Europe: An Interesting Question.
The European Council meeting held in Brussels on 8th/9th December resulted in a decision to establish, by March 2012, a new fiscal "compact" - see the European Council announcement. It seems likely that all current EU member States except the UK...
- Rolls Building Now In Use: Oligarchs Fighting In London: Premiership Football Viewing Etc
The Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, LondonUpdated High Court extension: The latest extension to the High Court's accommodation in London is the "Rolls Building" and it has come into use. Russell Conway, writing in the Solicitor's Journal...
Law and Rights
The Red White and Blue: Appeals and References
Update: "Pub landlady's copyright conviction quashed in TV football ruling" - Solicitor's Journal February 2012.
---
The Red White and Blue is in Portsmouth ( see here ). Hundreds of such pubs are closing each year and many are sorely in need of trade. The reasons for such closures need not concern us here. Such pubs are places where people are able to congregate, "put the world to rights", perhaps have a meal or bar snack and perhaps view a Premiership Football Match on the pub's large screen or, possibly, in 3D. To offer this facility will cost the pub a lot of money - (perhaps £1000 or more per month). It is hardly surprising therefore that some pubs have sought cheaper ways of screening matches. Karen Murphy is landlady of the Red White and Blue and, in 2006, she came up with the idea of using a Greek decoder as opposed to a decoder issued for use in the U.K. In Portsmouth Magistrates' Court, she was convicted of offences under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 s.297(1).
---
The Red White and Blue is in Portsmouth ( see here ). Hundreds of such pubs are closing each year and many are sorely in need of trade. The reasons for such closures need not concern us here. Such pubs are places where people are able to congregate, "put the world to rights", perhaps have a meal or bar snack and perhaps view a Premiership Football Match on the pub's large screen or, possibly, in 3D. To offer this facility will cost the pub a lot of money - (perhaps £1000 or more per month). It is hardly surprising therefore that some pubs have sought cheaper ways of screening matches. Karen Murphy is landlady of the Red White and Blue and, in 2006, she came up with the idea of using a Greek decoder as opposed to a decoder issued for use in the U.K. In Portsmouth Magistrates' Court, she was convicted of offences under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 s.297(1).
"A person who dishonestly receives a programme included in a broadcasting . . . service provided from a place in the United Kingdom with intent to avoid payment of any charge applicable to the reception of the programme commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale."
The Football Association Premier League Ltd (the FAPL) is the marketing organisation for the Premiership. FAPL grants licensees the
exclusive right to broadcast matches and exploit them economically within their respective broadcasting areas, generally the country in question. Matches are broadcast in encrypted form which has to be decoded by a country-specific decoder. Given that decoders are country-specific, charges vary from country to country. The reader will not be surprised to learn that the U.K. has one of the highest charges and Greece the lowest.
exclusive right to broadcast matches and exploit them economically within their respective broadcasting areas, generally the country in question. Matches are broadcast in encrypted form which has to be decoded by a country-specific decoder. Given that decoders are country-specific, charges vary from country to country. The reader will not be surprised to learn that the U.K. has one of the highest charges and Greece the lowest.
Karen Murphy appealed her conviction to the Crown Court but lost the appeal. The Crown Court was asked to "state a case" for the opinion of the High Court. This procedure is known as an "Appeal by way of Case Stated." Such appeals are an aspect of the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court and ensure that courts such as Magistrates' Courts operate within the law. It is a procedure by which the law can be clarified. However, if points of European Union law are raised, national courts are not the final authority on the meaning of the law. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Article 267 provides a reference procedure so that national courts can refer points to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling. The High Court has asked for such rulings in this case.
Art. 267 states:-
?The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning:
a) the interpretation of the Treaties;
b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union.
Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give a ruling thereon.
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court.
If such a question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State with regard to a person in custody, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall act with the minimum of delay."
The procedure adopted by the Court of Justice of the E.U. involves one of the Advocates-General of the Court delivering an opinion. Such opinions are highly influential though it is possible for the court to decide the matter against the opinion. In Mrs Murphy's case, Advocate-General Juliane Kokkot (pictured) has delivered her opinion which may be read here. In fact, Kokott's opinion also relates to a number of cases that have come together in the Court of Justice.
Given the so-called "internal market" it is difficult to see why these charges should vary within the EU from country to country and why individual countries have to be "locked in" to a specific charge. The Advocate-general's opinion has favoured Mrs Murphy. Territorial exclusivity agreements are contrary to EU law - according to Kokkot. It remains to be seen whether the Court of Justice agrees.
Article: A useful article on this issue is "Pub Football and the future of European broadcasting" - Tony Ballard and Ben Bye - Harbottle and Lewis LLP.
Media reports:
UEFA v Euroview - article discusses a further case involving broadcasts of matches.
Out-Law - 3rd February 2011
Out-Law - 3rd February 2011
Media reports:
The Publican - 6th October 2010 - "EU governments give evidence in Murphy satellite case"
The Guardian - "Karen Murphy may lead Sky Sports 1-0 but don't bet on the result"
Mail Online - "BSkyB reels on Murphy's law."
The Guardian 3rd February - "Pub landlady's EU case paves way for Premier League rights revolution"
The Telegraph 3rd February - "Pub landlady's European case threatens to scupper Premier League's £1.78 billion TV deal."
UK Free.TV - "Karen Murphy scores against the Premier League and Sky."
Sport Business - "Premier League criticises Advocate-General's legal 'opinion'
Addendum 6th February 2011: There is some well presented analysis of the commercial issues underlying this case in "EC official's court advice in TV rights case worries Premier League" - Owen Gibson, The Guardian 3rd February. There is no doubt that the "country-by-country" business model is enabling, for purely commercial reasons, the maximum value to be extracted from each country.
The Guardian 3rd February - "Pub landlady's EU case paves way for Premier League rights revolution"
The Telegraph 3rd February - "Pub landlady's European case threatens to scupper Premier League's £1.78 billion TV deal."
UK Free.TV - "Karen Murphy scores against the Premier League and Sky."
Sport Business - "Premier League criticises Advocate-General's legal 'opinion'
Addendum 6th February 2011: There is some well presented analysis of the commercial issues underlying this case in "EC official's court advice in TV rights case worries Premier League" - Owen Gibson, The Guardian 3rd February. There is no doubt that the "country-by-country" business model is enabling, for purely commercial reasons, the maximum value to be extracted from each country.
- Building The Eu Judicial System: Politicians 1, (judicial) Architects 0
Steve Peers The Court of Justice has recently proposed that the EU should double the number of judges on the General Court, and abolish the EU?s Civil Service Tribunal. Why did the Court propose such a dramatic change to the EU judicial system?...
- Enforcing Previous Judgments Of The Court Of Justice
By Steve Peers The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has recently delivered an interesting judgment concerning the so-called 'infringement procedure', which is the system for enforcing EU law directly in the EU courts. This system runs in parallel...
- New Uk Judge Appointed To The Court Of Justice Of The Eu
Christopher Vajda QC (currently of Monckton Chambers) has been appointed as the UK Judge to the Court of Justice of the European Union. He will succeed Sir Konrad Schiemann who has been the UK's judge there since 2004. Read the announcement...
- Europe: An Interesting Question.
The European Council meeting held in Brussels on 8th/9th December resulted in a decision to establish, by March 2012, a new fiscal "compact" - see the European Council announcement. It seems likely that all current EU member States except the UK...
- Rolls Building Now In Use: Oligarchs Fighting In London: Premiership Football Viewing Etc
The Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, LondonUpdated High Court extension: The latest extension to the High Court's accommodation in London is the "Rolls Building" and it has come into use. Russell Conway, writing in the Solicitor's Journal...