Law and Rights
- Damages For Breach Of Eu Free Movement Law: An Important Irish Judgment
Steve Peers It?s been well over twenty years since the CJEU established, in the case of Francovich, that individuals could sue Member States in damages for breach of EU law. Yet many of the cases concerned have been brought by businesses for lost...
- Reconciling Eu Free Movement Rules With Uk Border Controls
By Steve Peers Today?s Advocate-General?s opinion in the McCarthycase raises important questions about the scope of the EU?s free movement law rules and the relationship between those rules and EU or national rules on border controls and visas....
- What Happens To British Expatriates If The Uk Leaves The Eu?
By Steve Peers While much of the debate about the UK?s membership focusses upon the 2.3 million citizens of other EU countries living in the UK, a nearly identical number of UK citizens live in other Member States. There has been surprisingly little...
- Simplifying Applications For Schengen Visas For Third-country National Family Members Of Eu Citizens: Do The New Proposals Go Far Enough?
Steve Peers For many EU citizens whose family members are third-country nationals, particularly if those family members are citizens of an Asian, African or Caribbean country, free movement isn?t as free as it is for others. Unless they are travelling...
- Can Unemployed Eu Citizens Be Expelled And Banned From Re-entry?
Steve Peers As detailed in today?s Open Europe blog post, the idea of expelling unemployed EU citizens has recently been mooted in Germany, and is therefore interesting the critics of EU free movement in the UK. It is therefore a good time to examine...
Law and Rights
The UK implements EU free movement law ? in the style of Franz Kafka
Steve Peers
Most laws are complicated enough to start with, but with EU Directives there is an extra complication ? the obligation to transpose them into national law. A case study in poor transposition is the UK?s implementation of the EU?s citizens? Directive, which regulates many aspects of the movement of EU citizens and their family members between EU Member States. Unfortunately, that defective implementation is exacerbated by a further gap between the wording of this national law and its apparent application in practice, and by the unwillingness of the EU Commission to sue the UK (or other Member States) even for the most obvious breaches of the law.
It?s left to private individuals, who usually have limited means, to spend considerable time and money challenging the UK government in the national courts. One such case was the recent victory in McCarthy (discussed here), concerning short-term visits to the UK by EU citizens (including UK citizens living elsewhere in the EU) with third-country (ie, non-EU) family members. The UK government has just amended the national rules implementing the EU citizens? Directive (the ?EEA Regulations?) to give effect to that judgment ? but it has neglected to amend the rules relating to another important free movement issue.
Implementing the McCarthyjudgment
The citizens? Directive provides that if EU citizens want to visit another Member State for a period of up to three months, they can do so with very few formalities. However, if those EU citizens are joined by a third-country family member, it?s possible that this family member will have to obtain a short-term visa for the purposes of the visit. The issue of who needs a short-term visa and who doesn?t is mostly left to national law in the case of people visiting the UK and Ireland, but it?s mostly fully harmonised as regards people visiting all the other Member States.
Although the EU?s citizens? Directive does simplify the process of those family members obtaining a visa, it?s still a complication, and so the Directive goes further to facilitate free movement, by abolishing the visa requirement entirely in some cases. It provides that no visa can be demanded where the third-country family members have a ?residence card? issued by another EU Member State. According to the Directive, those residence cards have to be issued whenever an EU citizen with a third-country family member goes to live in another Member State ? for instance, where a British man moves to Germany with his Indian wife. Conversely, though, they are not issued where an EU citizen has not left her own Member State ? for instance, a British woman still living in the UK with her American wife.
How did the UK implement these rules? The main source of implementation is the EEA Regulations, which were first adopted in 2006, in order to give effect to the citizens? Directive by the deadline of 30 April that year. Regulation 11 of these Regulation states that non-EU family members of EU citizens must be admitted to the UK if they have a passport, as well as an ?EEA family permit, a residence card or a permanent residence card?. A residence card and permanent residence card are creations of the EU Directive, but an ?EEA family permit? is a creature of UK law.
While the wording of the Regulation appears to say that non-EU family members of EU citizens have a right of admission if they hold any of these three documents, the UK practice is more restrictive than the wording suggests. In practice, having a residence card was usually not enough to exempt those family members from a visa requirement to visit the UK, unless they alsoheld an EEA family permit. Regulation 12 (in its current form) says that the family member is entitled to an EEA family permit if they are either travelling to the UK or will be joining or accompanying an EU citizen there. In practice, the family permit is issued by UK consulates upon application, for renewable periods of six months. In many ways, it works in the same way as a visa requirement.
An amendment to the Regulations in 2013 provided that a person with a ?qualifying EEA State residence card? did not need a visa to visit the UK. But only residence cards issued by Germany and Estonia met this definition. This distinction was made because the UK was worried that some residence cards were issued without sufficient checks or safeguards for forgery, but Germany and Estonia had developed biometric cards that were less likely to be forged.
In the McCarthy judgment, the CJEU ruled that the UK rules breached the EU Directive, which provides for no such thing as an EEA family permit as a condition for admission of non-EU family members of EU citizens with residence cards to the territory of a Member State. The UK waited nearly three months after the judgment to amend the EEA Regulations to give effect to it.
The new amendments cover many issues, but to implement McCarthythey simply redefine a ?qualifying EEA State residence card? to include a residence card issued by any EU Member State, as well as any residence card issued by the broader group of countries applying the EEA treaty; this extends the rule to cards issued by Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Presumably this brings the rules into compliance with EU law on this point (the new rules apply from April 6th). That means that non-EU family members of EU citizens will not need a visa to visit the UK from this point, provided that they hold a residence card issued in accordance with EU law, because they are the non-EU family member of an EU citizen who has moved to another Member State. However, this depends also on the practice of interpretation of the rules, including the guidance given to airline staff.
?Surinder Singh? cases
On the other hand, the new Regulations do not implement other recent CJEU case law (discussed here) on what is known in the UK as the ?Surinder Singh? route. This is based on CJEU rulings which state that an EU citizen who moves to another Member State with non-EU family members can then return to his or her home Member State and invoke EU free movement law to ensure that this State admits his or her family members. The purpose of doing this is to avoid very restrictive rules on the admission of family members of British citizens into the UK, which are much more stringent than the EU free movement rules (Danish and Dutch citizens also use these rules).
The 2013 amendments to the Regulations state that this route can only be used where the ?centre of life? of the family concerned has shifted to another Member State. This is inconsistent with last year?s CJEU ruling, which requires only a three-month move to another Member State to trigger the rules. In practice, this test is then applied before an ?EEA family permit? is issued to the family member concerned, which allows that family member to reside in the UK with the UK citizen.
Since these parts of the Regulations have not been amended, and there is still provision for an ?EEA family permit? in the Regulations, presumably the intention is to continue to apply these rules to regulate the longer-term stay of UK citizens? family members using the Surinder Singh route.
Conclusion
The better course from the outset for the UK would have been to avoid the creation of the ?EEA family permit?, which is not provided for in any EU legislation or hinted at in any CJEU case law. Furthermore, not only do the UK rules not implement EU law correctly, they also are not applied in practice exactly as they are written, but on the basis of a general unwritten understanding about what they actually mean. This doesn?t even deserve to be called a ?policy?. Instead, the best description comes from Yes, Minister: it?s the ?policy of the administration of policy?.
Barnard & Peers: chapter 13
- Damages For Breach Of Eu Free Movement Law: An Important Irish Judgment
Steve Peers It?s been well over twenty years since the CJEU established, in the case of Francovich, that individuals could sue Member States in damages for breach of EU law. Yet many of the cases concerned have been brought by businesses for lost...
- Reconciling Eu Free Movement Rules With Uk Border Controls
By Steve Peers Today?s Advocate-General?s opinion in the McCarthycase raises important questions about the scope of the EU?s free movement law rules and the relationship between those rules and EU or national rules on border controls and visas....
- What Happens To British Expatriates If The Uk Leaves The Eu?
By Steve Peers While much of the debate about the UK?s membership focusses upon the 2.3 million citizens of other EU countries living in the UK, a nearly identical number of UK citizens live in other Member States. There has been surprisingly little...
- Simplifying Applications For Schengen Visas For Third-country National Family Members Of Eu Citizens: Do The New Proposals Go Far Enough?
Steve Peers For many EU citizens whose family members are third-country nationals, particularly if those family members are citizens of an Asian, African or Caribbean country, free movement isn?t as free as it is for others. Unless they are travelling...
- Can Unemployed Eu Citizens Be Expelled And Banned From Re-entry?
Steve Peers As detailed in today?s Open Europe blog post, the idea of expelling unemployed EU citizens has recently been mooted in Germany, and is therefore interesting the critics of EU free movement in the UK. It is therefore a good time to examine...